Tamnoon - Managed Cloud Detection & Response
founding sole product designer (3.5 years)​
Global Impact Highlights
I was the founding sole designer at tamnoon for 3.5 years, creating the entire user experience design from scratch and owning all major workflows including onboarding workflows, client's posture observability, remediation management, and monthly reporting.
Some of my favorites projects include
-
Manual remediation meets AI automation
Integrating AI-driven experiences into the product
-
System Dashboard overview surfacing client's security posture and clear focus areas
-
Creating and unifying our design system across two brand versions.
70%
Alert noise reduction
1,000 +
high severity remediations completed in the first 3 month
~20h → ~1h
MTTR reduced
87%
remediation cost reduction
The Challenge
Adfonic had no visual identity or website. Our team at HB needed to create a unique look and feel that would help Adfonic stand out and build trust with advertisers.
The Approach
Making it friendly
We introduced Tami, a friendly female mascot, to guide users through Tamnoon, making the experience feel warm, helpful, and easy to use
Approved Recommendation
Tamnoon's analysts are the final approvers. Once they decide the recommendation is valid, by clicking on "Create Initiative", the recommendation becomes editable draft initiative on the task board, ready to publish.
The system tracks recommendations logging, and present the by whom the initiative was validate.


Rejection Feedback Modal
Every rejection required a reason input captured for AI model retraining, to improve recommendation quality and encourage thoughtful user engagement
Key UX Challenges
Designing AI for a safety-critical security environment cretaed several specific challenges, on balancing automation with human expertise while maintaining absolute transparency:
-
Operational inefficiency & high cognitive load
Analysts spent excessive time on repetitive preparation tasks, slowing responses to critical security threats and increasing operational costs.
-
Decision fatigue & ​Inconsistent workflow
As volume increased, maintaining consistency across analysts' workflow became more difficult.
​ -
Limited visibility across customer environments
Fragmented tools and reliance on individual expertise reduced the ability to detect patterns and recurring issues across multiple customers.
​ -
Low trust in AI outputs
Analysts hesitated to fully rely on AI recommendations in a safety-critical security environment, requiring validation and review to ensure responsible decision-making and avoid errors or misaligned actions.
Analysts needed gradual exposure to AI support to build confidence, starting with preparation tasks before expanding to more impactful decisions.
-
Empower users
Any automation or AI assistance must support security experts without replacing judgment, maintaining transparency, accountability, and alignment with established workflows.
​ -
Risk of losing service transparency
In a combined human and AI-driven security service, analysts and customers need clear visibility into what was generated by AI, and what was reviewed or modified by a human expert.